|
|
Compare Deals
| Used (Very Good) | energyatwork | $1,680 |
|
|
ahmadenajadsukka
Posts: 0
|
|
Little slow tonight isn't it?
White man's burden, white man's burden.
It seems I'm temporarily light.
How's my credit in this joint anyway?
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
Arkadij
Junior Boarder
Posts: 35
|
|
I'm still trying to figure the names of those darned comedies I was watching over there. 2.4 Children was pretty funny, Bread I didn't get, One Foot in the Grave was a riot at times, Vicar Dibly, Father Ted, Bonzai
Then there was one about a writer who'd found out he had a kid and he was in love with a woman who'd become an MP,
and Nick Lindhurst in one about going back and forth in time between now and WWII that was fairly funny, one about canteen cooks, and the one about the toy factory office...
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
135Guy
Senior Boarder
Posts: 44
|
|
Vicar of Dibley... Very popular, although I don't watch it. One Foot in the Grave, good as far as it goes.
Not sure about that one
Goodnight Sweetheart
Dinner Ladies
So what about Men Behaving Badly? Seen that? That was excellent.
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
Quatre
Senior Boarder
Posts: 47
|
|
Sounds like Adrian Mole, but not sure if that was on TV...?
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
imported_Adrian
Junior Boarder
Posts: 32
|
|
Stop that!
You're as bad as my brother. At one point he was watching that film almost daily...
Scary, eh?
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
mysticwizard
Senior Boarder
Posts: 51
|
|
and Nick Lindhurst in one about going back and forth in time between now
That has a really clever plot.
Oh yeah,
Yes, that one's growing on me. It's on BBC America so I can see it here.
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
rohan_morajkar
Junior Boarder
Posts: 32
|
|
Naah, see, to my mind, that film isn't scary. It's chilling, it's eerie, but it's not scary. All atmosfear (hah!) and no jump. I still like it, but it's not a horror film.
And it has a better ending than the book...
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
fidofido
Senior Boarder
Posts: 43
|
|
Oh, I don't know. The TV adaptation of the first book was pretty good. Not that I remember it from the time, though.
Sad Ken - five years on amp-f, and still none the wiser
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
imported_Adrian
Junior Boarder
Posts: 32
|
|
I felt the recent BBC adaption (I think of The Cappaccino Years?) was okay, but it really played the whole thing for straight laughs, and I don't think the books are just straightforward comedy books. There is lot of poignancy in them which was lost in the adaption.
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
Dolemerts
Junior Boarder
Posts: 39
|
|
That's it - Adrian Mole, the cappaccino years.
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
Hedgehog
Senior Boarder
Posts: 50
|
|
Saw Kubrick's Shining on TV. It kept me literally on the edge of my seat. I'd read the book in a single sitting and was impressed that the film was every bit as riveting. I still haven't got over those King fanboys whining about how Stanley butchered it. He did a helluva lot better job on that book than anybody else has ever done with a King novel. Especially King himself.
|
|
Reply
New Topic |
|
|
|